Citizen engagement: from promise to practice
-
Chapter 1: Introduction2 Paragrafen
-
Chapter 2: Start with the right questions5 Paragrafen
-
Chapter 3: Designing the participation process6 Paragrafen
-
Chapter 4: Making participation succeed6 Paragrafen
-
Chapter 5: Understanding the impact of participation4 Paragrafen
-
Chapter 6: Skills, capacity, policies and governance needed4 Paragrafen
-
Chapter 7: Final thoughts1 Paragraaf
2.5. How do we safeguard trust and credibility?
Even when the purpose, mandate, timing, resources, and potential participants are all clear, people still need to trust the process itself. They need to believe it will be fair, honest, and genuinely open to their input.
Trust and credibility depends as much on how participation is organised as on what it is about. In Skive, credibility grew when the municipality acted openly, facilitated dialogue, and supported shared ownership rather than controlling every step. The contrast between the two village clusters showed that open and dialogical processes created more trust than technical and top-down ones.
Signe from Skive
The process is the message
Trust and credibilty is built through how the process is organised and experienced.
Make roles and decisions transparent.
This means being clear about who decides, who’s responsible, who has the final say
This is covered under 2.2: Do we have a clear mandate?
Be honest about constraints.
Political choices, legal rules, budgets, or implementation limits can all limit participation.
This is covered in 2.3: what timing and resources are required?
Be deliberate about who is involved, and how.
For example, an evening meeting at the town hall draws the usual faces. A chat at the school gate reaches the parents who never make it there.
This is covered in more depth under 4.2: Bring in diverse voices.
Use facilitation that feels neutral and respectful.
This is covered in more depth in 4.3: Facilitate dialogue across differences.
Communicate clearly and consistently throughout the process.
This is covered in depth in 4.4: Ensure continuous and transparent communication.
The perception of neutrality
Credibility isn’t only about actually being neutral. It’s also about being perceived as neutral, and staying that way throughout the process, not just at the start. Participants need to feel that the process isn’t controlled by one political agenda, one organisational interest, or a pre-decided outcome, regardless of whether that’s technically true. That perception is often hardest to maintain once the process is already underway.
It was challenging to maintain participants' confidence that nothing has been 'decided' yet.
Jasmien from Roeselare




